![]() This has helped to provide a smooth experience while reducing power consumption. ![]() As a result of this feedback, our R&D team has been working over the past few months to optimize the devices' performance when using many of the most popular apps, including Chrome, by matching the app's processor requirements with the most appropriate power. Following the launch of the OnePlus 9 and 9 Pro in March, some users told us about some areas where we could improve the devices' battery life and heat management. OnePlus issued a statement to Android Authority addressing the matter: "Our top priority is always delivering a great user experience with our products, based in part on acting quickly on important user feedback. We found that the OnePlus 9 series limits the performance of Google Chrome while older OnePlus phones do not. In some of our own testing, we found that AnandTech's data is on the mark. Geekbench called Oxygen OS's behavior a form of "benchmark manipulation." OnePlus has yet to issue a statement on the matter. After conducting its own investigation, Geekbench recently announced that it has removed all OnePlus 9 benchmarks from its charts. Geekbench, one of the more popular benchmarking sites, took these allegations seriously. According to the team's research, Oxygen OS apparently limits the performance of some popular Android apps - but none of those apps are benchmark suites. Android Authority reports: Yesterday, AnandTech posted some information about "weird behavior" it spotted with the OnePlus 9 Pro. The answer is no, so everyone needs to calm down about this.Popular benchmark site Geekbench has removed OnePlus 9 benchmarks from its charts due to allegations that the company designed Oxygen OS optimization tools in such a way that they could be viewed as cheating. But again, does that extra 1-2% in a benchmark score really reflect daily performance? It’s also worth pointing out that OnePlus aren’t the only ones who have been caught cheating as large manufacturers like Samsung and HTC have also been caught doing so. Take a moment to remember that synthetic benchmarks are just that - synthetic. Take a moment to read and watch the reviews. Take a moment to think about how it would actually affect you. What I am saying, though, is that just because you see an article with a fantastic headline about a manufacturer cheating, doesn’t mean you should lose your collective minds about it. Cheating isn’t OK in any shape or form and the company’s official statement regarding the matter doesn’t really help their situation either. And to be fair, the OnePlus did not cite benchmark numbers at all in their launch presentation nor did they make any benchmark claims on their product site.ĭon’t get me wrong, I’m not making excuses for OnePlus nor am I saying that it’s OK for them to cheat. ![]() Besides, if you’ve seen any of the OnePlus 5 reviews that have come out, everyone is saying the same thing - the OnePlus 5 is super fast. What’s likely more important is optimisation and efficiency. Unless you’re a super heavy mobile gamer these numbers will often not mean anything to you. If you’ve ever read any of my reviews, you would probably have noticed that I don’t place much emphasis on benchmark performance mainly because I don’t think it accurately reflects real-world usage. In my experience, this could mean absolutely nothing. On the GPU benchmark side, though, XDA-Developers found that the although it didn’t thermal-throttle, the OnePlus 5’s GPU was running at 50-degrees Celsius which makes it more than a little uncomfortable to hold.īut what does this actually mean in the real world? This amounted to about a 5% increase in CPU multi-core performance (on GeekBench 4) without any significant changes in CPU temperature. It is sort of like OnePlus was letting its phone go Super Saiyan when running certain applications.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |